Appellant failed to comply with direction to prepare paper book and did not appear despite notices. Court dismissed the First Appeal by default for lack of interest.
Instant appeal dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24.07. 2023 item No.13 n.b. ct. no. 551 FMA 3265 of 2013
Buri Basfor
Vs.
Union of India.
Mr. Avinash Kankani, Mr. Suman Majunder,
…..for the respondent.
The respondent Union of India is represented by Mr. Avinash Kankani, learned advocate.
It appears from the record that the appellant is not appearing in this matter since long.
Initially at the time of filing of the instant appeal, the direction was given to the appellant on May 14, 2014 for preparation of paper book. The direction of the Court for preparation of paper book is not complied with by the appellant.
Observing the absence of the appellant, this Court is directed the department to issue an administrative notice. The administrative notice was issued to the registered address of the appellant as mentioned in the Memo of the Appeal. The registered consignment returned as insufficient address.
None appears on behalf of the appellant on first call as well as on second call.
2
Considering the situation, it appears to me that the appellant is not at all interested to proceed further with this appeal. Thus, it is necessary to dispose of the appeal.
Hence it is ordered that the instant appeal is dismissed for default.
Connected CAN applications, if any, are also disposed of.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
( Subhendu Samanta, J.)
Buri Basfor
Union of India
Subhendu Samanta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
