appeal was dismissed. The Court dismissed the appeal filed by Akash Biswas against the non-interference order of the Single Judge, holding no reason for interference with the University's decision.
No order as to costs. The appeal is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item-7. 05-10-2023
sg
Ct. 8
FMA 264 of 2023 CAN 1 of 2023
Akash Biswas
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Kamalesh Bhattacharya, Adv. Mr. Sabyasachi Mukhopadhyay, Adv. …for the appellant Mrs. Nandini Mitra, Adv. Mr. Sourabh Sengupta, Adv.
…for the Calcutta University
2
was not found suitable. The selection was made in accordance with Rules after taking into consideration the qualification and the marks to be allotted to each of the candidate for their qualification have been duly assessed.
(Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere with the High Court's order dismissing the writ petition challenging the non-selection of the appellant.
Whether the court should interfere with the selection committee's decision due to the non-disclosure of the score sheet before the High Court initially.
Akash Biswas
Calcutta University
Uday Kumar
Soumen Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
