This order disposed of FMA 158 of 2022 and CAN 1 of 2021. The appellant sought to withdraw the appeal via a Warrant of Instruction, which was accepted. The appeals were subsequently dismissed as not pressed.
Appeal dismissed as not pressed; appellant directed to inform respondent of this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
4 Court No. 11 20.03.2023 G.S.Das
FMA 158 of 2022
With
CAN 1 of 2021
Krishnendu Sarkar
-Vs-
The State Bank of India & Ors.
Mr. Dyutiman Banerjee
… for the Appellant
Mr. Banerjee, Learned Advocate, appears for the appellant.
Mr. Banerjee is also the Advocate-on-record in the appeal.
Mr. Banerjee produces a Written Instruction ( WI ) to the effect that the appellant wishes to withdraw the appeal.
A copy of the WI , as produced in Court today, be retained with the record.
Accordingly, FMA 158 of 2022 (MAT 1055 of 2021) with CAN 1 of 2021 stands dismissed as not pressed .
Since none appears for the respondent/State Bank of India (SBI), Learned Advocate for the appellant is directed to communicate this order to the Respondent/Bank as well as to their Learned Counsel.
All parties to act on a server copy of this order duly
2
obtained from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties, subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Supratim Bhattacharya, J.) (Subrata Talukdar,J.)
Krishnendu Sarkar
The State Bank of India & Ors.
Supratim Bhattacharya
Subrata Talukdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
