The appellate court dismissed CAN 1 of 2020 filed by Himendra Kumar Roy as it was withdrawn by the appellant due to lack of instructions. Conversely, CAN 2 of 2020 filed by the same appellant against Merina Roy was allowed.
CAN 1 of 2020 dismissed; CAN 2 of 2020 allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FAT 74 of 2019
Item-1. 23-02-2023
sg
Ct. 8
CAN 1 of 2020 (old CAN 4854 of 2020) CAN 2 of 2020 (old CAN 4855 of 2020)
Himendra Kumar Roy Versus Merina Roy
Mr. Debasis Kar, Adv.
...for the appellant
The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that he has received instruction from the appellant not to proceed with the matter. The petitioner has filed an application to that effect.
Under such circumstances, the appeal stands dismissed as
withdrawn.
CAN 2 of 2020 (old CAN 4855 of 2020) is, accordingly, allowed.
In view of the dismissal of the appeal, CAN 1 of 2020 (old CAN 4854 of 2020) also stands dismissed.
(Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Himendra Kumar Roy
Merina Roy
Uday Kumar
Soumen Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
