Cygnet Industries Ltd. . v. Tarun Kumar Mustafi and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
2025 (AK) 06 F.A.T 46 of 2023 Cygnet…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
14th January, 2025 (AK) 06
F.A.T 46 of 2023
Cygnet Industries Limited Vs.
Tarun Kumar Mustafi and others
Mr. Debdatta Sen Mrs. A. Ghosh Chatterjee
...for the appellant. Mr. Debajyoti Basu Mr. Debajyoti Mondal
...for the respondent no.1.
- Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that previously the appeal was directed to be heard along with the application.
- It is submitted that since a copy of an affidavit-inopposition to the stay application bearing CAN 1 of 2023 has been served on the appellant, the appellant seeks to use a reply to the same.
- On the prayer of learned counsel for the appellant, the time for filing reply is extended till January 17, 2025.
- Let the appeal and the application be listed on January 20, 2025.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Cygnet Industries Limited
- respondent
Tarun Kumar Mustafi
Coram
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- FAT/46/2023
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya Uday Kumar
- Order 2 · Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya Supratim Bhattacharya
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court