The Single Judge Bench of the Calcutta High Court dismissed the appeal and connected application for non-prosecution by the appellants. Any interim order was vacated.
Appeal and connected application dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
10.01.23 Sl-08 Ct.32 (S.R.)
FAT 131 of 2022 with CAN 1 of 2022
Sri Atunu Dutta & Ors. v. Gitanjali Builders & Developers & Anr.
Mr. Dyutiman Banerjee Mr. Mukut Biswas
… for the appellants.
Mr. Banerjee, learned advocate appearing for the appellants submitted on instruction that the appellants do not want to proceed with the matter any further.
Let a copy of the written instruction be kept on record.
Hence, the appeal and the connected application are dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
There shall, however, be no order as to costs.
Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied
for, be supplied as expeditiously as possible.
(Partha Sarathi Chatterjee, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.)
Sri Atunu Dutta & Ors.
Gitanjali Builders & Developers & Anr.
Partha Sarathi Chatterjee
Tapabrata Chakraborty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
