Dismissed
Khairun Bibi v. Subhas Chandra Roy & Ors.
Calcutta HCFA/339/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2014 Khairun Bibi Versus Subhas Chandra…
What the court decided
AI extract
of 2014 Khairun Bibi Versus Subhas Chandra…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Item28-03-2023 95&96.
Ct. 8 sg
FA 339 of 2014 Khairun Bibi
Versus
Subhas Chandra Roy & Ors.
With
FAT 620 of 2014 Sujit Mondal Versus Subhas Chandra Roy & Ors.
The appellants are not represented nor any accommodation
is prayed for on behalf of the appellants.
This matter is appearing in the list for quite sometime. They have adequate notice but in spite thereof, they are not represented. It appears that the appellants are not interested to proceed with the appeal.
In view thereof, both the appeals stand dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Uday Kumar, J.) (Soumen Sen, J.)
Khairun Bibi
Sujit Mondal
Subhas Chandra Roy
Uday Kumar
Soumen Sen
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court