The High Court allowed an application for restoration of an appeal dismissed for default, accepting sufficient reason for the delay and reviving alternating interim orders automatically.
CAN 4 of 2024 is allowed; FA 123 of 2012 restored to original file; interim orders revived.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
AD-06 Ct No.16 11.02.2025 TN
FA 123 of 2012 IA No: CAN 4 of 2024
Sri Abani Kanti Maji Vs.
The Chairman, Property Committee, Bengal Regional Conference and others
Mr. Surya Prasad Chattopadhyay, Mr. Arjun Samanta, Mr. Ankit Chatterjee, Ms. Trishtrya Mancherji
….for the appellant
Mr. Sandip Kumar De, Mr. Abhijit Sarkar
….for the respondent no.1
In re: CAN 4 of 2024
2
orders which were subsisting at that point of time, it is deemed that the said orders which were subsisting at the relevant juncture automatically stand revived as on this date.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
(Uday Kumar, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant's application for restoration of the appeal after default due to delay was conceivably accepted.
Abani Kanti Maji
The Chairman, Property Committee, Bengal Regional Conference
Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya
Uday Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
