Dismissed
Md. Shakil v. Sm. Jamuna Devi Jaipuria and 7 Others
Calcutta HCCS/56/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
No application for summary provision
What the court decided
AI extract
No application for summary provision
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-7
ORDER SHEET
CS/56/2019 IA No.GA/2/2019
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE
MD. SHAKIL
Versus
SM. JAMUNA DEVI JAIPURIA AND 7 OTHERS
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO Date : February 8, 2023.
Appearance :
Mr. Debnath Ghosh, Adv. Ms. Sayani De, Adv. … for the defendant nos. 4 to 8
The Court: The matter was listed as “To Be Mentioned” on 1st February, 2023 but none appeared on behalf of the plaintiff and for the interest of justice, the matter was adjourned till today. In the order dated 1st February, 2023 it is mentioned that in case none appears on behalf of the plaintiff, appropriate orders will be passed. Today when the matter is called, none appears on behalf of the plaintiff and no accommodation is sought for.
Counsel for the defendant nos. 4 to 8 submits that since long none appears on behalf of the plaintiff and prays for dismissal of the instant suit.
Considered the prayer made by the counsel for the defendant nos.4 to 8. Perused the record.
2
It is found from the record that the plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the matter.
In view of the above, this Court has no other alternative but to dismiss the suit. Accordingly, CS/56/2019 is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected application is also dismissed.
The Department is directed to draw up the decree accordingly.
(KRISHNA RAO, J.)
RS
KRISHNA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court