The plaintiff in suit CS/285/2010 requested to withdraw the suit with liberty to file afresh. The defendant failed to appear. The court granted liberty to withdraw the suit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-41
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE
CS/285/2010
KANKANI ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED VS ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE KRISHNA RAO Date : 16th January, 2023.
Appearance: Mr. Sarosij Dasgupta, Adv. Mr. S. Majumder, Adv. …for plaintiff.
The Court:- Counsel for the plaintiff is present and prayed for withdraw of the suit with liberty to file afresh. The matter was listed on 10th January, 2023 and the same prayer was made by the Counsel for the plaintiff. This Court had directed the plaintiff to inform the date of hearing to the learned Counsel for the defendant. Learned Counsel for the plaintiff is handed over a copy of the communication dated 11th January, 2023. Counsel for the plaintiff has informed the defendant bank about the date but inspite of the receipt of the notice, none appears on behalf of the defendant bank. Let the copy be communicated 11th January, 2023 be kept with the records. In view of the submission made by the Counsel for the plaintiff, the plaintiff given liberty to withdraw the instant suit being CS/285/2010 with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action.
(KRISHNA RAO, J.)
SK.
KANKANI ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED
ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE
KRISHNA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
