Court dismissed the revisional application as withdrawn by the petitioner after accepting the prayer to withdraw the case.
Revisional application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22.08.2023 Sl. No.:12
Court No.30
CRR 701 of 2020
Debiprosad Bhattacharya vs. State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Debapratim Guha Mr. Anohita Sarkar
… for the petitioner Mr. Joydeep Roy Ms. Puspita Saha ... for the State Mr. Prantick Ghosh Mr. Siddhartha Sarkar
… for the opposite party No.2 The opposite party no.2/the defacto complainant has filed supplementary affidavit stating therein that the deceased was a non-diabetic person.
At this stage, the petitioner files a written instruction stating that they do not want to proceed with the revisional application and pray for withdrawal of the case.
Considering the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the opposite party no.2 and the learned counsel for the State who has placed the case diary, the prayer of the petitioner is allowed.
The revisional application is dismissd as withdrawn.
The case diary be returned to the learned counsel for the State.
( Shampa Dutt (Paul), J. )
Debiprosad Bhattacharya
State of West Bengal
Opposite party no.2
Shampa Dutt
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
