The High Court at Calcutta dismissed Criminal Revisional Application No. 354 of 2018 as a default application. The petitioner had abandoned the address and failed to appear despite the case being pending since 2018, with no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
The revisional application stands dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
47 23.08.2023 Court No.237 pg.
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE
CRR 354 of 2018
Shilpi Jain Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Suman Ganguly Mr. Aniruddha Bhattacharyya … For the opposite party nos.2 to 4
Learned advocate on behalf of the opposite party nos.2 to 4 is present.
It is found that the case is pending since 2018. This revisional application was taken out assailing the order of discharge of all the opposite parties.
Administrative notice was sent and from the record it is found that the petitioner left the address six years back. However, none is representing the petitioner.
In such circumstances, the revisional application stands dismissed for default.
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
Shilpi Jain
The State of West Bengal
Ors.
Bibhas Ranjan De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
