Ruma Mondal v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal revision against an order of acquittal, the bench held that the application was bereft of merit as the petitioner and respondent divorced via mutual consent. It disposed of the application accordingly.
What did the court decide?
The revisional application along with application, if any, is dismissed.
What the court decided
18.1.2023 13 SB Ct. No.236
CRR 2423 of 2005
In the matter of : Ruma Mondal
Mr. Soumik Ganguly Mr. Supriyo Shasmal … for the petitioner Mr. Kaushik Chatterjee Mr. Tirthankar Dey … for the O.P.Nos.2,3&4 Mr. N. P. Agarwala Mr. P. Bose … for the State
Photocopy of the Order No. 38 dated 09.9.2009 passed in
MAT Suit 76 of 2008 is taken on record.
Mr. Dey, learned counsel representing the opposite party nos. 2,3 & 4 submits that the marital knot between the petitioner and opposite party no. 2 has been dissolved by a decree of divorce on mutual consent on 09.9.2009 subsequent to the disposal of Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 2004 whereby the learned Appellate Court was pleased to set aside the order of conviction passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Khatra in G.R. Case No. 221 of 2000.
Taking into consideration the subsequent development whereby the petitioner and the opposite party no. 2 decided to dissolve the marital knot by converting suit for divorce into one under Section 13(B) of the Hindu Marriage Act that too without reserving any right to proceed with or to initiate any other proceeding under law, I am of the view that the present application
for reversal of the order of acquittal is bereft of merit and should be dismissed which I accordingly do.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revisional application for reversal of the order of acquittal merits allowance given the subsequent mutual consent divorce decree passed in the matrimonial suit.
Whether the petitioner's claim has merit after the marital relationship was dissolved by decree of divorce on mutual consent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ruma Mondal
- respondent
Opposite Party No. 2
- respondent
State
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRR/2423/2005
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court