Single line order disposing of criminal revision petition by referring to identical facts dealt with in a previous judgment, CRR/8/2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION [CIRCUIT BENCH AT PORT BLAIR]
CRR/9/2023
Shri Muthu
Versus
The Administration of Andaman and Nicobar Islands and others
Mr. Mit Guha Roy (through virtual mode) Mr. Pardeshia Munda for the petitioner Mr. Shatadru Chakraborty Mr. Dibesh Dwivedi for the opposite party No. 1 Mr. Salim Mohammed For the opposite party No. 2-7
September 20, 2023 (Manoj) (item No. 2)
The petitioner has assailed the order dated the 6th January, 2023 passed by the Magistrate in C.R. Case no. 03 of 2022.
This case is on identical facts and grounds, as has been dealt with by this Court in CRR/8/2023. Accordingly, this case would also be considered and disposed of in terms of the judgment passed by this Court in CRR/8/2023.
(Rai Chattopadhyay, J.)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
CRR/8/2023Referred¶11
Shri Muthu
The Administration of Andaman and Nicobar Islands
Rai Chattopadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
