The Calcutta High Court at Jalpaiguri dismissed a criminal revision petition as not pressed because the petitioner's counsel withdrew the petition during hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04.01.2023 SL No 12. Court No.3 BR
Circuit Bench of Calcutta High Court At Jalpaiguri
CRR 193 of 2022
In the matter of: Sri Shyama Prasad Biswas …. Petitioner.
Mr.Debajit Kundu, Mr. Soham Banerjee … for the petitioner
Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, Mr. Biswarup Roy …. For the State
Mr. Soham Banerjee, learned counsel for the petitioner does
not want to proceed with the petition under the instruction.
Under such circumstances, the criminal revision is dismissed as not pressed.
(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.)
Sri Shyama Prasad Biswas
The State
Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
