Dismissed
Mritunjoy Singh v. CBI
Calcutta HCCRR/1468/2015
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Revisional application filed to challenge the rejection of a discharge prayer under Section 239 CrPC was dismissed as infructuous since the petitioner had already been convicted in the case.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
07 16.11. 2023 CRR 1468 of 2015 Ct 237
¶2
Sri Mritunjoy Singh Vs. The Central Bureau of Investigation
¶3
rup
¶4
- Mr. Abhra Mukherjee, Mr. Souradeep Dutta, Mr. Sakshaar Kr. Mondal, Mr. Arpayan Mukherjee … for the petitioner. Mr. Amajit De, … for the C.B.I. 1. This revisional application has been filed challenging the order of rejection dated 19.03.2015 against the prayer for discharging the accused under Section 239 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
¶5
- Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has already been convicted in the case involved in this revisional application and thereby the instant revisional application challenging the particular order of rejection dated 19.03.2015 becomes infructuous.
¶6
- Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the C.B.I. is also present.
¶7
- Considering all facts and circumstances, I find no reason to continue with this revisional application.
¶8
2
¶9
- Accordingly, the revisional application stands
¶10
dismissed being infructuous.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sri Mritunjoy Singh
- respondent
The Central Bureau of Investigation
Coram
AI extract
Bibhas Ranjan De
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRR/1468/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court