Revisional applications dismissed for default due to failure of the petitioner to appear despite notice and listing.
Applications CRR 1335/2016 and 1336/2016 dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23 14.08. & 2023 CRR 1335 of 2016 24 Debesh Chandra Manna Ct 237 versus The State of West Bengal & Anr.
rup
With
CRR 1336 of 2016
Debesh Chandra Manna
versus The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Soumik Ganguli, Mr. Supriyo Shasmal. … for the opposite party no.2.
Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee, Mr. Imran Ali, Mrs. Debjani Saha … for the State.
Learned advocates appearing on behalf of the opposite party no.2 as well as learned advocates appearing on behalf of the State are present.
None appears on behalf of the petitioner in spite of issuance of administrative notice.
The case is pending since 2016. From the record, it appears that the matter was listed on several occasions.
Considering all facts and circumstances, the revisional applications being CRR 1335 of 2016 and CRR 1336 of 2016 stand dismissed for default.
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
2
Debesh Chandra Manna
The State of West Bengal
Bibhas Ranjan De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
