The High Court dismissed a revisional application challenging an FIR under Section 482 CrPC. The court held the application infructuous as the petitioners had been discharged for want of evidence. Pending applications were consequently disposed of.
Revisional application dismissed as infructuous; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
23.03.2023 Ct. No.34 S/L No.13 KS
C.R.R. 1107 of 2021
Pranab Dutta & Anr. -Vs.-
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
In Re: An application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Mr. Jayanta Narayan Chatterjee Ms. Jayashree Patra Ms. Sreeparna Ghosh …..For the O.P. No.2 Ms. Anasuya Sinha Mr. Pinak Kumar Mitra …..For the State
The revisional application was preferred for challenging the First Information Report in connection with Jadavpur Police Station Case No.426 of 2020 dated 25.12.2020 under Sections 302/ 201/ 498A/ 406/ 34/ 120B of the Indian Penal Code.
The records of the revisional application reflect that the revisional application was admitted on 29th July, 2021.
Ms. Sinha, learned advocate appears on behalf of the State and submits a report which reflects that the present petitioners, Pranab Dutta and Paromita Dutta were discharged from the case for want of evidence. Report so submitted be kept with the record.
In view of the aforesaid, the revisional application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, C.R.R. 1107 of 2021 is dismissed as infructuous.
Pending applications, if any, are consequently disposed of.
2
All parties are directed to act on the server copy of this order downloaded from the official website of this Hon’ble Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revisional application under Section 482 CrPC can be dismissed as infructuous after the petitioners were discharged for want of evidence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pranab Dutta
Paromita Dutta
The State of West Bengal
Tirthankar Ghosh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
