In an order dated 05.09.2023 (CRR 1089 of 2015), the High Court dismissed the revisional application as withdrawn. The State had submitted a report showing trial initiation, making the revision infructuous. The court kept questions open for trial.
The revisional application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
05 09.08. 2023
Ct 237
rup
CRR 1089 of 2015
Nathulal Sonkar & Ors. Vs. The State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Ayan Bhattacherjee, Mr. Manish Shukla. … for the petitioners .
Mr. Pravas Bhattacharya, Mr. A.F.A. Begg. … for the State.
Both the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the petitioners as well as State are present.
Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the State has submitted a report, showing initiation of trial by examining the witnesses. Let the report be kept with the record.
Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners has prayed for withdrawal of the revisional application which has become infructuous after initiation of trial.
All questions raised in this revisional application be kept open for trial.
Accordingly CRR 1089 of 2015 stands dismissed as withdrawn.
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow withdrawal of a revisional application after initiation of trial which rendered it infructuous.
Nathulal Sonkar & Ors.
The State of West Bengal
Bibhas Ranjan De
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
