Dismissed
Sunil Kumar Mondal v. State of West Bengal & Anr.
Calcutta HCCRR/1031/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Sl. No.: 35 Court No.30 BM CRR 1031 of 2019…
What the court decided
AI extract
Sl. No.: 35 Court No.30 BM CRR 1031 of 2019…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.06.2023
Sl. No.: 35
Court No.30
BM CRR 1031 of 2019
Sunil Kumar Mondal Vs. State of West Bengal & Anr.
Mr. Tanmay Chowdhury
... for the petitioner
Ms. Rita Datta
… for the State
A written instruction is filed by the learned advocate on record wherein it is seen that the petitioner has stated that his rented room has already been vacated by the tenant and as such, he does not wish to proceed with the revisional application.
Ms. Rita Datta present in court today is appointed to represent the State. Her appointment be regularised by the appropriate authority.
On perusal of the revisional application, it appears that the dispute was relating to return of the vacant room. Accordingly, in view of the written instruction and the material on record, the revisional application is disposed of as withdrawn.
( Shampa Dutt (Paul), J. )
Sunil Kumar Mondal
State of West Bengal
Shampa Dutt (Paul)
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court