The criminal revisional applications stood dismissed as not pressed, and any interim orders were vacated upon the petitioners' instruction to withdraw proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16.1.2023 32+33 Sc
CRR 1029 OF 2009 with
I.A. No.CRAN 1 OF 2009 (Old No.CRAN 1009 OF 2009)
with CRR 2963 OF 2007 with I.A. No.CRAN 1 OF 2007 (Old No.CRAN 2438 OF 2007) with I.A. No.CRAN 5 OF 2009 (Old No.CRAN 1008 OF 2009)
-------
In the matter of: Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Ors.
…. Petitioners
Mr. Niranjay Kumar Singh
…For the Petitioners
Mr. Narayan Prasad Agarwala Mr. Pratick Bose.
…For the State
Mr. Niranjay Kumar Singh, learned advocate on record for the petitioners submits that he has been instructed verbally by the petitioners not to proceed with these revisional applications.
When the petitioners do not want to proceed with these cases, I do not find any reason to stand in their way.
The criminal revisional applications, CRR 1029 of 2009 with CRR 2963 of 2007 with the respective connected applications stand dismissed as not pressed.
Interim order/orders, if any, stand vacated.
ACO
A copy of this order be placed with the records of CRR 2963
of 2007
(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.)
Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Ors.
State
Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
