The Supreme Court dismissed the application for condonation of delay by the applicant due to non-prosequently. Consequently, the application for special leave to appeal was dismissed as barred by limitation.
Application for condonation of delay dismissed; application for special leave to appeal dismissed as barred by limitation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
20.07.2023. 35. Ct.No.28 as
CRMSPL 20 of 2018 with C.R.A.N.1 of 2019 (Old CRAN 851 of 2019)
In the matter of : Sanchita Mondal.
… Applicant.
Nobody appears for the applicant to prosecute the application for condonation of delay.
Accordingly, the application being CRAN 1 of 2019 (Old CRAN 851 of 2019) for condonation of delay is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Consequentially, the application for special leave to appeal is dismissed as barred by limitation.
(Ajay Kumar Gupta,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for special leave to appeal is maintainable when the application for condonation of delay was dismissed due to non-prosecution.
Sanchita Mondal
Ajay Kumar Gupta
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
