Allowed

Manoj Biswas v. the State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC12 Sept 2023CRM(NDPS)/608/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Calcutta High Court allowed a bail application under Section 439 CrPC for a petitioner in an NDPS case detained for 823 days. Noting the lack of trial progress despite charged framing, the court deemed the period mitigating and granted bail subject to standard conditions including bond, appearance, and non-interference.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount, one local, conditional upon not leaving jurisdiction, attending trial dates, and not inducing witnesses or tampering with evidenc

Manoj Biswas Vs the State of West Bengal — Narcotics (NDPS) | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

AD-39 Ct No.01 Jalpaiguri 12.09.2023 B.Pal

¶2

Calcutta High Court In The Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri Appellate Side

¶3

CRM (NDPS) 608 of 2023

¶4

In Re: - An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 14.08.2023 in connection with CR(NDPS) case no.60/2021, corresponding to Matigara Police Station Case No. 496 of 2021 dated 12.06.2021 under Sections 21(C of the NDPS Act, 1985.

¶5

And

¶6

In the matter of: MANOJ BISWAS

¶7

Ms. Kakoli Bose, Mr. Akhil Biswas, Mr. S. Bhagat,

¶8

… for the petitioner

¶9

Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty, Mr. Sourav Ganguly,

¶10

… for the State

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the petitioner has already been in custody for 823 days. That apart, the provisions of Section 41B of the NDPS Act were contravened. The charges were framed, it is contended, on April 12, 2022 but the trial has not seen progress since then.

¶12

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and argues that the provisions of Section 41B of the NDPS Act were fully complied with.

¶13

Upon hearing, it is evident that the petitioner is already in custody for 823 days, despite the trial having not yet

¶14

¶15

commenced effectively, although the charges were framed as far back as on April 12, 2022.

¶16

In view of the above period of incarceration, we consider it to be sufficiently mitigating to entitle the petitioner to bail.

¶17

In such view of the matter, CRM (NDPS) 608 of 2023 is allowed, thereby granting bail to the petitioner on condition that the petitioner shall furnish bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Judge, Special Court (NDPS Act), Siliguri.

¶18

The petitioner shall not leave the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court during the entire period of trial and shall attend each and every date of trial.

¶19

Further, the petitioner shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing such facts to any police officer or the court and/or tamper with the evidence in any manner whatsoever.

¶20

(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)

¶21

(Uday Kumar, J.)

Manoj Biswas v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Biswas v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saddam Hussain @ Rahit Khan and Anr. Vs the State of West Bengal and Anr.

Raju Das Vs the State of West Bengal

Goutam Barman Vs the State of West Bengal

Dulu Barman Vs the State of West Bengal

Sahabuddin Ali @ Babu Vs the State of West Bengal

Karan Das Vs State of West Bengal