Allowed

Surendra Kumar Mishra v. the State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC2 Mar 2023CRM(DB)/83/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Calcutta granted bail to the petitioner, who had been in custody for over ten years in a kidnapping and murder case. The court held that inordinate delay infringed the petitioner's fundamental right to speedy justice and ordered bail subject to strict conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties, subject to strict conditions regarding court appearance and jurisdiction.

Surendra Kumar Mishra Vs the State of West Bengal — Bail and Remand | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

02.03.2023 Sl. No.21 akd [ALLOWED]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Circuit Bench at Jalpaiguri

¶3

C. R. M. (DB) 83 of 2023

¶4

In Re: An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 30.01.2023 in connection with Siliguri Police Station Case No.79 of 2013 dated 25.01.2013 under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently charge sheet submitted under Sections 364A/302/201/120B/394/411/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

And

¶6

In Re: Surendra Kumar Mishra

¶7

… … Petitioner

¶8

Mr. Hillol Saha Podder Ms. Mousumi Das

¶9

… … for the petitioner

¶10

Mr. Aditi Shankar Chakraborty .. ld. Addl. Public Prosecutor Mr. Aniruddha Biswas

¶11

… … for the State

¶12

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is in custody for more than ten years. It is further submitted there is inordinate delay in trial.

¶13

Report is placed on record. From the report it appears that the matter has been fixed for argument.

¶14

We have considered the materials on record. Allegations involve kidnapping for ransom and murder. No doubt the offences are very grave. Petitioner is in custody for more than ten years and the matter is pending for argument since 2019. Even if one discounts 2020 and 2021 due to pandemic conditions, it is unclear why the trial could not be concluded in 2022. Under such circumstances, we are constrained to hold the fundamental right to speedy justice of the petitioner has stood infracted and he is entitled to bail on this score however, subject to strict conditions.

¶15

¶16

Therefore, the accused/petitioner, namely Surendra Kumar Mishra , be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/(Rupees Ten thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siliguri, Darjeeling subject to condition that the said petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever and on further condition that the petitioner, while on bail, shall not leave the jurisdiction of Matigara Police Station except for the purpose of attending court proceedings and shall report to the Officer-in-charge, Matigara Police Station once in a week until further orders.

¶17

In the event he fails to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail automatically without reference to this court.

¶18

The application for bail, thus, stands allowed .

¶19

(Subhendu Samanta, J.)

¶20

(Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Surendra Kumar Mishra v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surendra Kumar Mishra v. the State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sushil Chakraborty Vs Juin Chatterjee and Anr.

Nani Gopal Roy & Ors. Vs Shanti Devi Mittal & Ors.

Soumitra Sreemani Vs New Central Book Agency Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Avijit Bose Vs the State of West Bengal

MD Mehebub Alam@Mehebub Alam Vs the State of West Bengal

Mongla Kisku@Manmohan Kisku Vs the State of West Bengal