Single-paragraph order allowing a petition for cancellation of anticipatory bail. The court stated it would not interfere given a Memorandum of Understanding entered between the parties and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Cancellation of anticipatory bail granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
03.05.2023 31 Ct. No. 29 CHC
C.R.M. (DB) 749 of 2023
In Re: An application for cancellation of anticipatory bail under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
And
In the matter of: Sonam Bajoria nee Kheria
...… petitioner
Mr. Debasish Roy, Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, Mr. L. Vishal Kumar, Ms. Manswita Mukherjee ….for the petitioner Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, Ld. A.P.P. Mrs. Sonali Das ….for the State Mr. Kallolo Mondal, Mr. Krishan Ray, Mr. Souvik Das, Mr. A. Banerjee
….for the private opposite party no.2 Petitioner and the opposite party no.2 are present in Court.
Petitioner, private opposite party and the State are represented.
It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner and the opposite party no.2 that they entered into a Memorandum of Understanding.
In such view, we do not mind to interfere in this proceeding.
CRM (DB) 749 of 2023 is disposed of accordingly.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
2
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for cancellation of anticipatory bail under Section 439(2) CrPC should be allowed given the existence of a Memorandum of Understanding.
Sonam Bajoria nee Kheria
State
Debangsu Basak
Md. Shabbar Rashidi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
