Allowed

Sunil Adhikary and Anr. v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC18 Aug 2023CRM (DB)/3195/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to petitioners charged with murder, noting investigation completion, lack of absconding risk, and dearth of direct evidence connecting them to the deceased. Bail was allowed with specific conditions regarding bond amount, location restrictions, and court attendance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, subject to conditions of staying within jurisdiction and weekly police reporting.

Sunil Adhikary and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

18.08.2023 10 sdas allowed

¶2

CRM(DB) No. 3195 of 2023

¶3

In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Santipur Police Station Case No. 05 of 2023 dated 02.01.2023 under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

And

¶5

In Re : Sunil Adhikary & Anr. ...… petitioners

¶6

Ms. Minoti Gomes .…for the petitioners

¶7

Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, learned APP Ms. Zareen M. Khan Mr. Asif Dewan

¶8

…. for the State

¶9

1.Petitioners are in custody for over 100 days. It is also contended that there is no direct evidence connecting them with the murder. Investigation is complete. They pray for bail.

¶10

2.Learned Counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits petitioners were seen with the co-accused, Swapan Rava (father of the deceased) prior to the incident. Thereafter body of the deceased was recovered. On the leading statement of the petitioner no. 2 weapon of offence i.e. iron wire was recovered. Personal belonging of petitioner no. 2 was also recovered from the place of occurrence.

¶11

3.We have considered the materials on record. Petitioners did not have motive to commit the crime. None of the witnesses saw them with the deceased prior to the incident. Whether the alleged recoveries would form a complete chain to implicate the petitioners in the murder may be assessed during trial.

¶12

¶13

Investigation is complete. There is no chance of abscondence. Hence, we are inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

¶14

4.Accordingly, we direct that the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ranaghat, Nadia, on further condition that while on bail petitioners shall remain within the jurisdiction of district Nadia except for the purposes of investigation and /or attending court proceeding and shall meet the officer-in-charge of Santipur Police Station once in a week until further orders. Petitioners shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate the witnesses and/or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

¶15

5.In the event the petitioners fail to appear before the trial court without justifiable cause, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel their bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

¶16

6.The application for bail is, accordingly, allowed.

¶17

(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Sunil Adhikary and Anr. v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Adhikary and Anr. v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rohis Khan @ Raish Khan @ MD Raish Khan @ Mustak Mollaji Vs State of West Bengal

Swapan Kumar Paira Vs Superintendent of Police,Siu-C,Cbi,Scb,Kolkata

Amit Kr @ Amit Thakur @ Amitabaha @ Gullu Vs State of West Bengal

Atar Ali Sk and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Pintu Dey Sarkar Vs State of West Bengal

Sankar Roy Vs State of West Bengal