Sunil Kumar Jha v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application under CrPC Section 439 dismissed as not pressed after the Senior Advocate for the applicant withdrew the application during arguments.
Bail application under CrPC Section 439 dismissed as not pressed after the Senior Advocate for the applicant withdrew the application during arguments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
25.07.2023. 19 Ct. No.28 as
C.R.M. (DB) 2637 of 2023
In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Special CBI Case No.01 of 2022 under Sections 120B read with Sections 379/409/420/467/468/471/411/413/414 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 7/8/13(2)/13(1)(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 2018 read with Section 21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act.
In the matter of : Sunil Kumar Jha.
… Petitioner.
Mr. Sandipan Ganguly, ld. Sr. Adv., Ms. Manaswita Mukherjee. …..for the Petitioner.
Mr. Arun Kr. Maiti (Mohanty), Mr. Amajit De, Spl. PP. …for the CBI.
After arguing for some time, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner does not wish to proceed with the application.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Ajay Kumar Gupta,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
4 provisions across 4 enactments
Sunil Kumar Jha
CBI
Ajay Kumar Gupta
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court