The petitioner renewed a prayer for anticipatory bail in connection with an FIR under various sections of the IPC regarding cases at Pukhuria Police Station. The State argued that the petitioner had already been arrested. The Court disposed of the application as infructuous.
Application for anticipatory bail disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
03.04.2023 C.R.M. (A) 975 of 2023 Sl.3 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Court No.29 the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Pukhuria (AD) Police Station Case No. 471 of 2022 dated 10.11.2022 under (Disposed of as Sections 156/332/353/326/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, infructuous) corresponding to G.R. Case No.3098/2022. And
In the matter of: Saddam Hossain ….petitioner. Mr. Saibal Bapuli, Ld. APP Mr. Arani Bhattacharyya …for the State. None appears for the petitioner in the second call. By this application, the petitioner renews the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Learned Advocate appearing for the State submits that the petitioner was arrested on March 20, 2023.
In such circumstances, C.R.M. (A) 975 of 2023 is disposed of infructuous.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for anticipatory bail becomes infructuous after the arrest of the petitioner.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Saddam Hossain
State
Debangsu Basak
Md. Shabbar Rashidi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
