The court rejected an application for anticipatory bail filed by Dilip Nayak. The petitioners were accused of submitting fake documents to prove illness, aiding a relative in securing a government job, hindering the investigation.
The prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected and the application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
24.02.2023
C.R.M. (A) 774 of 2023
Sl.3 Court No.29 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of (AD) the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Kotwali (Rejected) Police Station Case No .826 of 2022 dated 18.11.2022 under Sections 419/420/468/469/471/472/473/120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 corresponding to G.R. Case No.3787 of 2022.
And
In the matter of: Dilip Nayak @ Dilip Nayek ….petitioner. Mr. Shibaji Kumar Das Ms. Rupsa Sreemani …for the petitioner. Mr. Madhusudan Sur, Ld. APP Mr. Manoranjan Mahata …for the State.
Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.
Petitioner is being investigated in respect of offences of forgery and falsification of documents.
It appears that the petitioner submitted documents which are not genuine so as to establish his illness in order to facilitate a near relative of the petitioner to obtain government job.
In such circumstances, protecting the petitioner with a pre-
arrest bail at this stage will be inimical to the investigation.
Consequently, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
C.R.M. (A) 774 of 2023 is dismissed.
(Debangsu Basak, J.)
(Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to a petitioner accused of forgery where false documents were submitted regarding illness to facilitate a relative obtaining a government job.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Dilip Nayak @ Dilip Nayek
State
Debangsu Basak
Md. Shabbar Rashidi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
