Dismissed
Miya Atiur Rahaman @ Atiul Rahaman and Anr. v. the State of West Bengal
Calcutta HCCRM(A)/646/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The Calcutta High Court refused anticipatory bail to petitioners charged with offences under Sections 498A and 304B IPC. The Court held there were sufficient prima facie allegations and the presumption under Section 113B of the Evidence Act was applicable. Petitioners are granted liberty to surrender.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to petitioners to surrender and seek bail in normal course. Anticipatory bail application dismissed.