The High Court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. connected to a cheating and rape case as the petitioner failed to press the application during the hearing.
The application for anticipatory bail CRM (A) 2878 of 2023 is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
18.08.2023 C.R.M. (A) 2878 of 2023 SL. 15 Court No. 29 Sourav In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Nowda Police (DNP) Station Case No. 277 of 2022 dated 09.10.2022 under Sections 417/376 IPC. And In the matter of: Ajarul Sk @ Ajerul Sk. ….petitioner. Mr. Tapodip Gupta …for the petitioner. Mr. Pravash Bhattacharya Mr. Mirza Firoj Ahmed Begg … for the State. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner does not want to press the application for anticipatory bail. 3. Accordingly, the application being CRM (A) 2878 of 2023 is dismissed as ‘not pressed’. (Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for anticipatory bail, not pressed by the petitioner, should be allowed or dismissed.
Disposal of the application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. as not pressed by the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sourav In Re.: Ajarul Sk @ Ajerul Sk.
The State
Chitta Ranjan Dash
Partha Sarathi Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
