Allowed

Golam Rasul v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC28 Jul 2023CRM (A)/2835/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single judge court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a fight case. While noting injuries were sustained, the court held they were not grievous. Bail was granted subject to surety bonds and specific conditions, including restricting the petitioner to certain jurisdictions and reporting weekly.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties and subject to specific conditions.

Golam Rasul Vs State of West Bengal — Anticipatory Bail | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

28.07.2022 tkm/ct 28 sl no. 43

¶2

C.R.M. (A) 2835 of 2023

¶3

In Re : An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Baduria P.S case no. 319 of 2023 dated 27.5.2023 under sections 447/323/325/307/354/506/34 IPC

¶4

And

¶5

Allowed

¶6

In Re : Golam Rasul …… petitioner

¶7

Mr. S Basu Ms. Ranu Mondal …… for the petitioner Mr. S S Imam Ms. R Jana …… for the State

¶8

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there was free

¶9

fight between the parties. Case and counter case were registered. He prays for bail.

¶10

Learned lawyer for the Sate opposes the bail prayer.

¶11

Learned lawyer for the de facto complainant also opposes

¶12

the bail prayer. He contends five persons were injured.

¶13

We have considered the materials on record. It appears that there was free fight between the parties. Though a number of persons were injured, injuries do not appear to be grievous.

¶14

In view of the aforesaid circumstances we are of the opinion though custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary, petitioner requires to be subjected to restrictions in order to prevent commission of similar offence.

¶15

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid

¶16

¶17

down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner while on bail shall not enter the jurisdiction of Baduria P.S. until further orders except for the purpose of investigation and attending court proceeding and shall report to the concerned officer in charge within whose jurisdiction he shall reside while on bail once in a week until further orders and shall provide the address where he shall presently reside while on bail to the investigating officer as well as court below.

¶18

Petitioner shall appear before the court below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

¶19

The application being CRM (A) 2835 of 2023 is disposed of.

¶20

(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Golam Rasul v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Golam Rasul v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sabbyasachi Chatterjee @ Bhola Vs State of West Bengal

State of West Bengal Vs Md. Samsuddoha

Rupali Bittar Vs Kush Ghosh & Ors.

Tasarul Sk@Ritha and Anr. Vs State of West Bengal

Abdul Rajjak@Abdul Reja@Rajesh Ali @Rajesh Vs State of West Bengal

Partha Ganuly Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.