On 02.08.2023, the court heard an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC filed by Suvayan. None appeared for the petitioners when the matter was called. The application was dismissed for non-prosecution.
Application challenged under Section 438 CrPC dismissed for non-prosecution due to absence of petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
02.08.2023
02.08.2023 C.R.M. (A) 2310 of 2023 SL. 10 Court No.29 Suvayan In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. And In the matter of: Rajendra Agarwal & Ors. ….petitioners Mr. Avishek Sinha …for the State. Mr. Dipanjan Dutt Mr. Surojit Saha …for the de facto complainant. 1. The mater was fixed to today on the prayer of learned Counsel for the petitioners. 2. None appears for the petitioners when the matter is called. 3. Accordingly, CRM (A) 2310 of 2023 is dismissed for nonprosecution. (Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.)
(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the application for anticipatory bail should be dismissed for non-prosecution.
Whether the petitioners appeared to prosecute the application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Suvayan
State
Rajendra Agarwal & Ors.
Chitta Ranjan Dash
Partha Sarathi Sen
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
