Shri K.Raghu v. the State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Calcutta High Court, Circuit Bench at Port Blair, allowed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC in connection with an FIR for rape. Conditions for bail and reporting were imposed.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail allowed with conditions: bond of Rs. 10,000, two sureties, monthly reporting, and court appearance.
What the court decided
29.03.2023 Serial no. 02 [Dd] (Anticipatory bail) Allowed )
Calcutta High Court In The Circuit Bench at Port Blair Andaman & Nicobar Islands Appellate Side
CRM (A) 2 of 2023
In re : An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Police Station Aberdeen, Port Blair, South Andaman District FIR No. 09 of 2023 dated 09.01.2023 under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
-And-
In the matter of : Shri. K. Raghu
… … Petitioner
Md. Tabraiz, Mr. Rakesh Pal Gobind, Mr. Parashar Baidya, Advocates … … For the Petitioner
Mr. Salim Mahammad, Advocate … …For the State
The petitioner is employee in the private sector. He claims that he is to participate in a process granting him promotion.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in connection with an FIR under Section 376 IPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shri. K. Raghu
- respondent
The State
Coram
Debangsu Basak
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Calcutta HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM(A)/2/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court