Dismissed

Prabhakar Mondal v. State of West Bengal

Calcutta HC10 Aug 2023CRA (DB)/250/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Division Bench dismissed the bail appeal of Prabhakar Mondal, an appellant in a criminal case involving the NIA. The court rejected the submission that allegations were false and held that investigation materials established the appellant as a prime player in an extortion racket and bomb manufacturing from within the correctional home. Consequently, bail was denied due to the gravity of the of

What did the court decide?

Bail prayer dismissed; appeal against the bail rejection order dismissed.

Prabhakar Mondal Vs State of West Bengal — Corruption | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

10.08.2023 4 sdas rejected

¶2

C.R.M.(DB) No. 1399 of 2023

¶3

In Re : Prabhakar Mondal …. petitioner

¶4

Department is directed to re-number the case as a criminal appeal forthwith.

¶5

(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

¶6

Later

¶7

CRA(DB) No. 250 of 2023

¶8

In Re : Prabhakar Mondal …. appellant

¶9

Mr. Arani Bhattacharya Ms. Bindia Paul ….for the appellant

¶10

Mr. Bhaskar Prosad Banerjee Mr. D. Tandon Mr. Parashar Baidya …… for the NIA

¶11

Subject to re-numbering of the case following order is

¶12

passed :

¶13

Learned Counsel for the appellant submits he is in custody. Mobile phone purportedly seized from his possession does not stand in his name. Allegation of holding out threat or extortion calls from the correctional home is out and out false.

¶14

¶15

Leaned trial Judge failed to consider these relevant aspects and turned down the bail prayer. Hence, the present appeal.

¶16

Learned Counsel for the NIA opposes the bail prayer and submits appellant was carrying on an extortion racket from the correctional home. Statement of protected witness shows he received ransom calls from the appellant. In the course of routine raid mobile phones, SIM Cards were recovered from the appellant. Materials collected during investigation show appellant had contacted with the co-accused who were assigned to prepare bombs to threaten the victims who had received ransom calls.

¶17

We have considered the materials on record. Investigation reveals an organized crime activity from inside the correctional home. Statement of protected witness shows he received ransom calls from the appellant. His statement is corroborated by recovery of mobile phones and SIM Cards from the appellant. Forensic analysis of the electronic gadgets and CDRs corroborate the prosecution case. It also establishes involvement of the appellant in manufacturing bombs to aid his extortion racket. Appellant had contacted co-accused Sirdhartha Mondal in the correctional home and the latter instructed co-accused to prepare bombs. They were injured in the process. These activities prima facie establish involvement of the appellant as a prime player in the extortion racket. Under such circumstances, in view of gravity of the offence, materials collected during investigation and the possibility of

¶18

¶19

appellant continuing similar criminal activities, if on bail, do not persuade us to enlarge him on bail.

¶20

Accordingly appeal is dismissed.

¶21

Report filed on behalf of NIA is placed on record.

¶22

(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

Prabhakar Mondal v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhakar Mondal v. State of West Bengal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abdul Chhalam Mia @ Abdul Chalam Vs State of West Bengal

Partha Ranjan Saha Vs State of West Bengal

Ruma Ghosh Vs State of West Bengal & Anr.

Ajay Bhumij Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Khodadil Sk @ Khodadil Sekh Vs State of West Bengal and Anr.

Sandip Kumar Jaiswal Vs State of West Bengal