The appellant declared that he is not willing to proceed with the appeal. The court disposed of the criminal appeal as being Not Pressed and dispensed with the appellant's personal appearance.
The Criminal Appeal (CRA) 509 of 2019 disposed of as Not Pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
22.3.2023 50 AB Ct. No.236
CRA 509 of 2019
In the matter of : Manas Ranjan Das.
Mr. Debabrata Acharyya Mr. Sital Samanta … … for appellant Mr. Lal Mohan Hazra Mr. Somesh Panja Ms. Anuradha Hazra Ms. Moutusi Hazra …. For respondent No. 2 Mr. Narayan Prasad Agarwala Ms. S. Patel Mr. Pratick Bose … … for the State
Heard Mr. Acharya, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Hazra, learned counsel for the respondent No. 2. It is submitted that, the appellant has decided not to proceed with the appeal. The written instruction addressed to advocate on record, submitted by Mr. Acharya which is taken on record. When appellant is not willing to proceed with the appeal, let the same be disposed of as being “Not Pressed”.
This Criminal Appeal is thus disposed of.
The appellant Mr. Manas Ranjan Das is present in Court today, his personal appearance is dispensed with.
Copy of the order sheet be sent to the learned Court below for information and necessary action.
(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J.)
Manas Ranjan Das
State
Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
