Court dismissed the condonation of delay application due to nonprosecution, consequently dismissing the appeal as barred by limitation based on the judgment's terms and CRAN 1 of 2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
09.08.2023 tkm/ct 28 sl no. 40
CRA 382 of 2019 CRAN 1 of 2019 (Old CRAN 2399/19)
In Re : Dipankana Sarkar …..appellant
Nobody appears to move the application for condonation of delay.
Accordingly, the application for condonation of delay being CRAN 1 of 2019 (Old CRAN 2399/19) is dismissed for nonprosecution. Consequentially, the appeal is dismissed as barred by limitation.
(Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Condonoation of delay application dismissed for nonprosecution
Appeal barred by limitation due to failure to condone delay
Dipankana Sarkar
Ajay Kumar Gupta
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
