In an order dismissing a delay condonation application for non-prosecution as ordinarily maintainable
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
04.08.2023 29 sdas
CRA 204 of 2014 with CRAN 1 of 2014 (Old CRAN 4280 of 2014)
In Re : Sri Subhendu Dutta …… applicant/appellant
In Re : CRAN 1 of 2014 (Old CRAN 4280 of 2014)
Nobody appears to move the application for condonation of delay. Accordingly, application is dismissed for nonprosecution.
Consequentially criminal appeal being CRA 204 of 2014 is dismissed as barred by limitation.
(Gaurang Kanth, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal appeal is barred by limitation due to non-condonation of delay.
Prima facie whether suit for condonation of delay is maintainable without prosecution.
Sri Subhendu Dutta
Gaurang Kanth
Joymalya Bagchi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
