The Single Judge held that the impugned order dated 27.06.2022 had been complied with. Consequently, the contempt application was disposed of and the rule was discharged without costs.
Contempt application disposed of; rule discharged; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16.06.2023. Court No.13 Item No. 22 ap
CPAN 379 of 2023 In
W.P.A. No. 11671 of 2016
Ajit Kumar Maji Versus
Md. Khalid Aziz Anwar, The Director of Pension, Provident Fund & Group Insurance, West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sudipta Maiti.
…For the petitioner.
Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Vaisya, Mr. Ranjan Saha
…For the alleged contemnor no.1.
Mr. Shamim-ul Bari.
…For the alleged contemnor nos.2 & 3.
( Rajasekhar Mantha, J. )
Ajit Kumar Maji
Md. Khalid Aziz Anwar
Rajasekhar Mantha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
