This order dismisses a contempt application for default due to the non-appearance of the applicant. No accommodation under the rules of this court was sought by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11 08.05.2023. C.P.A.N. 118 of 2010 ab Ct. 759 Ashoke Kumar Gayen Vs. Ashok Bandopadhyay
No one appears on behalf of the applicant.
No accommodation is sought for. Accordingly, the contempt application is
dismissed for default.
There shall be no order as to costs.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.)
Ashoke Kumar Gayen
Ashok Bandopadhyay
Rajarshi Bharadwaj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
