Suman Saha v. Bakul Saha @ Bakul Chandra Saha
Case brief
What is this about?
In this revision under Article 227, the Calcutta High Court examined an appeal where the lower appellate court failed to consider alleged suppression of facts by a plaintiff in obtaining an interim injunction. The Court held that Article 227 jurisdiction is limited to perversity or erroneous exercise of jurisdiction and found no ground for interference, dismissing the application.
What did the court decide?
The revisional application and the connected appeal were dismissed without any order as to costs.