the dominus lites of the suit have contended that their father, Sri Ananda Biswas has granted licence to the defendant and he has also revoked the licence on behalf of the plaintiffs as the plaintiffs at the relevant point of time, were minor. Accordingly, said Ananda Biswas has exclusive knowledge about the issue involved in the suit and the suit is required to be heard and disposed of in his presence. When the word “Party” is used with reference to a proceeding in a court it means of person who has a part to play in the proceeding. The principle for impleading a third party to a proceeding is avoidance of multiplicity of proceedings and hence court has jurisdiction to add a party, who is necessary or properly party. A necessary party is one without whom no order can be made effectively and proper party is one whose presence is necessary for a complete and final decision on the questions invoked in the proceeding. One of the objects of Order I, rule 10 is to enable the court to try and determine for all the materials questions between the parties and the third parties and not merely the questions between the parties in the suit. Here the question involved is whether the person who is sought to be added as a party in the suit by the plaintiffs, had actually granted any licence to the defendant or not in respect of suit property on behalf of the plaintiffs and whether such licence was subsequently revoked by that person on behalf of minors/plaintiffs or not at the
