Disposed

Sajahan Biswas v. Emdadul Haque

Calcutta HC16 Aug 2023CO/707/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged an order of the lower appellate court which did not interfere with an interim direction to police station during execution. The Court disposed of the revision without interference, observing that proper remedy lay in expeditious disposal of the appeal and that no sufferance would occur as no complaint was filed.

What did the court decide?

Revision disposed without interference with impugned order but with directions for expeditious disposal of the appeal and addressing specific points regarding police direction.

Sajahan Biswas Vs Emdadul Haque — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

Item No. 10 16.08.2023 Court. No. 19 GB

¶2

C.O. 707 of 2023

¶3

Sajahan Biswas Vs. Emdadul Haque

¶4

Mr. Partha Pratim Roy, Mr. Dyutiman Banerjee

¶5

… for the Petitioner.

¶6

The petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated January 20, 2023, passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Jangipur, District-Murshidabad in Misc. Appeal No.04 of 2022.

¶7

By the order impugned, the order passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1^st Court at Jangipur dated October 31, 2022 in Title Suit No.143 of 2022, was not interfered with at the interim stage as the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Jangipur did not find sufficient materials to pass the order of stay.

¶8

The point raised by the petitioner as to whether the order of implementation of the ad interim order by police help could be issued on the first day when the ad interim order was passed, without any formal application alleging violation of the ad-interim order, has merit.

¶9

Hence, this Court is of the view that the proper remedy of the petitioner would be to get the misc. appeal disposed of expeditiously, preferably within a month from the next date fixed. The above point raised, shall be decided as well.

¶10

¶11

Mr. Roy has, prima facie, impressed the Court that the direction of the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1^st Court at Jangipur directing the I.C. Raghunathganj Police Station to render assistance in case of allegation by the plaintiff, could not have been passed without there being specific allegation and findings of violation. Yet, the question should be decided upon hearing the contesting parties.

¶12

However, this Court is of the view that the observation was qualified by the expression ‘if any assistance is sought for’. As of now, according to Mr. Roy, no such complaint had been filed before the police authorities. Hence, this order will not cause any sufferance to the defendant for the period of one month within which the misc. appeal should be disposed of. The misc. appeal shall be heard on all points and also on the points raised by Mr. Roy with regard to the correctness of the order and direction upon the I.C., Ragunathganj Police Station.

¶13

Accordingly, the revisional application is disposed of without any interference with the order impugned, but with the directions stated hereinabove.

¶14

The learned lower appellate court shall ensure that the LCR, if not already sent, shall reach the learned court below within ten days from communication of this order.

¶15

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on priority basis.

¶16

(Shampa Sarkar, J.)

Sajahan Biswas v. Emdadul Haque

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sajahan Biswas v. Emdadul Haque

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abu Salam Gazi Vs Dilsad Ali Sk and Ors.

Samir Dey Vs Bhagawati Prasad Saraf and Anr.

Sree Siddhidata Enterprise Vs South Dumdum Municipality

Utsab Mondal Vs Pintu Naskar and Anr.

Parveen Begum @ Sk. Parvin Begam and Ors. Vs Basera Khatoonand Ors.

Saikat Sammaddar Vs Kaliprosad Banerjee