Allowed

Diptarshi Dey v. Debikanya Dutta

Calcutta HC12 Jul 2023CO/425/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court in revision allowed the petitioner's application challenging an order that denied territorial jurisdiction of Sealdah Court. The Court found sufficient evidence, including Aadhaar cards and jurisdiction documents, to establish Sealdah's jurisdiction over the matrimonial suit regarding the wife's ancestral home. The impugned order was set aside, and the suit was remanded to be dispos

What did the court decide?

The impugned order was set aside; the matrimonial suit was directed to be disposed of expeditiously within three months.

Diptarshi Dey Vs Debikanya Dutta — Matrimonial and Divorce | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

July 12, 2023 Sl. No.1 Court No.19 s.biswas

¶2

CO 425 of 2023 Diptarshi Dey

¶3

vs. Debikanya Dutta

¶4

Mr. Pramit Chakraborty Mr. Subhranil Ray

¶5

… for the petitioner Ms. Kakali Samajpaty Ms. Sangita Jangra Ms. Pratima Barman

¶6

… for the opposite party

¶7

This revisional application has been filed challenging an order dated December 8, 2022, passed by learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track, 2^nd Court, Sealdah in Matrimonial Suit No.89 of 2022.

¶8

By the order impugned, the learned court below came to a finding that the parties had not presented the petition before the appropriate District Court, having territorial civil jurisdiction to try the matrimonial suit. According to the learned court below, the husband had failed to show any document indicating where he last resided or where both the parties last resided or where the parties resided on the date of presentation of the petition.

¶9

In other words, the court came to the finding that there was nothing on record to show that the suit could be filed within the jurisdiction of the Sealdah Court.

¶10

Both the learned advocates appearing for the husband and the wife submit that the learned Court

¶11

¶12

had jurisdiction to hear the matter. The pleadings would indicate that the parties last resided together as husband and wife at 3, Canal Street, North Block, 4^th Floor, Flat No.4A, Kolkata-700014.

¶13

The documents which have been produced before this court, namely, the Aadhaar Card, which reflects the address of the wife’s paternal home. The territorial jurisdiction of the courts in respect of the District 24 Parganas has been produced before this court. It appears that Entally is under the territorial jurisdiction of the Sealdah court.

¶14

Hence, the order impugned is set aside. The learned court below is directed to proceed with the Matrimonial Suit No.89 of 2022 expeditiously and dispose of the same within next three months from date. The revisional application is thus disposed of.

¶15

All the parties are directed to act on the basis of the server copy of the order.

¶16

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities.

Diptarshi Dey v. Debikanya Dutta

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Diptarshi Dey v. Debikanya Dutta

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raghav Kajaria Vs Indranil Ghosh and Ors.

Madan Chandra Paul Vs Smt Malina Mondal

Smt. Shanta Dawn(Biswas) Vs Sri Gopal Chakraborty

Bikasjia Bhattacharjya@Bikasija Bhattacharya Vs Chikitsabratai Udyog Society

Goutam Mondal Vs Ankan Das and Anr.

Goutam Mondal Vs Sabari Ghosh and Anr.