Respondent side indicated that the matter had been settled amicably out of court, leading to the non-prosecution and disposal of the revisional applications by the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
16.8.2023 ct. 236 sk,sl. 62
C.O. 405 of 2014
CAN 3/2019,CAN 4/2019
Shiw Kumar Sharda & Anr.-vs-shiv Kumar Kothari
Mr. Anirban Mitra
Mr. Anit Halder Mr. Amit Roy
Ms. Madhumita Sadhukhan
…for the petitioners.
Heard Mr. Anirban Mitra, learned counsel for
the petitioners.
Mr. Mitra submits under the written instructions that the matter since has been settled amicably out of court, the petitioners do not want to proceed with the lis.
Under such circumstances, this revisional application is disposed of for non-prosecution.
The written instructions is taken on record.
The applications being CAN 3/2019, CAN
4/2019 are disposed of.
(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury,J)
Shiw Kumar Sharda & Anr.
shiv Kumar Kothari
Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
