Disposed

Jinat Ali Mondal Alias Zinat Ali Mondal and Anr. v. Abul Kasem Mondal

Calcutta HC24 Jan 2023CO/18/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition under Article 227 sought direction for expeditious disposal of an interim injunction application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC and the connected title suit. The Court dispensed with notice and directed the lower court to decide the application within twelve weeks.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the learned Civil Judge to dispose of the application under Order XXXIX rule 4 CPC expeditiously within twelve weeks and make every endeavour for expeditious disposal of the suit.

Jinat Ali Mondal Alias Zinat Ali Mondal and Anr. Vs Abul… — Property and Title | Calcutta HC (2023)

¶1

24.1.2023 19 Ct. no. 652 sb

¶2

C.O. 18 of 2023

¶3

Jinat Ali Mondal @ Zinat Ali Mondal & Anr. Vs. Abul Kasem Mondal

¶4

Mr. Dhananjoy Banerjee Mr. Surajit Basu …for the petitioners

¶5

This is an application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeking expeditious trial and disposal of an application filed under Order XXXIX , rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in connection with Title Suit no. 164 of 2020 pending before the court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1^st Court, Barasat, North 24 parganas.

¶6

The petitioners contended that the opposite parties herein filed aforesaid suit for declaration, and permanent injunction and the said opposite party moved an application on 30.3.2020 for injunction under Order XXXIX rule 1 and 2 and the trial court was pleased to direct the petitioner/plaintiff in the said suit not to interfere with the suit plot.

¶7

The petitioner submits that after receipt of the summon, they appeared on 11.2.2021 after lock down and filed an application under Order XXXIX rule 4 of the Code. The application has not yet been taken up for hearing by the court below and he is seeking a direction

¶8

¶9

upon the court below for expeditious disposal of the said application as well as the suit.

¶10

Since the prayer made by the petitioner is very innocuous and if it is heard and disposed of in terms of prayer, neither party will have a cause to prejudice, service of copy of the application and notice to the opposite party is hereby dispensed with.

¶11

In view of above, C.O. 18 of 2023 is disposed of with a direction upon the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1^st Court, Barasat, North 24 parganas to dispose of the application filed by the petitioner under Order XXXIX rule 4 of the Code as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of communication of the order and to make every endeavour for expeditious disposal of the suit.

¶12

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

¶13

(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)

Jinat Ali Mondal Alias Zinat Ali Mondal and Anr. v. Abul Kasem Mondal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jinat Ali Mondal Alias Zinat Ali Mondal and Anr. v. Abul Kasem Mondal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sameer Nairantarya Vs Munmun Nairantarya Nee Mondal

Baidyanath Santra & Ors. Vs Gourhari Sanki & Ors.

Robilal Bose Vs Subhas Chandra Dey & Anr.

Nitya Gopal Das and Ors. Vs Dinesh Das and Ors.

Debasish Mondal and Anr. Vs M/S. Green Shire Construction and Ors.

Sagar Sadhikhan Vs Payel Sadhukhan