Petitioner's revisional application in CO 1237 of 2019 is allowed to be withdrawn as the underlying title suit has been withdrawn. Application dismissed upon withdrawal.
Revisional application dismissed as withdrawn; copy of written instruction taken on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2.1.2023 2 Ct. no. 652 sb
CO 1237 of 2019
Dr. Anirban Sengupta Vs.
Usha Rani Chowdhury & ors.
Mr. Deeptangshu Kar …for the petitioner
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the title suit being No. T.S. 241 of 2012 in respect of which the present revisional application has been preferred, has been withdrawn by the plaintiff/opposite party herein. Accordingly, the present revisional application has become infructuous and accordingly prayed for withdrawal of the revisional application.
Let C.O. 1237 of 2019 be dismissed as withdrawn.
Let a copy of the written instruction submitted by the petitioner, be taken on record.
(Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)
Dr. Anirban Sengupta
Usha Rani Chowdhury
Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
