In a non-prosecution scenario where the petitioner submitted that the parties had settled the dispute amicably out of court, the High Court dismissed the revisional application filed by Bina Tiwary against Dr. Mrs. Nira Chatterjee.
Revisional application dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
28.6.2023 ct. 236
sk,sl. 6.
C.O. 1224 of 2014
Bina Tiwary-vs-Dr. Mrs. Nira Chatterjee
Mr. Arnab Roy Mr. Soumyadeep Mukherjee
…for the petitioner.
On 13th June, 2023 Mr. Arnab Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner sought for an accommodation. The matter was adjourned to appear on 28.6.2023. Today, learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that parties have settled their disputes amicably out of court. Therefore, the petitioner does not want to proceed with the revisional application.
Under such circumstances, I do not find any reason to stand in the way having found no reason not to rely upon the submission of an officer of the court, albeit absence of there is no written instructions.
This revisional application is thus dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury, J)
Bina Tiwary
Dr. Mrs. Nira Chatterjee
Siddhartha Roy Chowdhury
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
