Petitioner fulfilled terms of revised appointment letter; Court found compliance with impugned order and dismissed contempt proceedings.
Contempt proceedings dropped; The Rule discharged and the proceedings disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD-4
ORDER SHEET
CC 60 of 2022 WITH
WPO 1240 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (CONTEMPT) ORIGINAL SIDE
UPENDRA KUMAR
VS.
RAJANVIR SINGH KAPUR & ORS.
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE ARINDAM MUKHERJEE Date: 9th June, 2023.
Mr. Debdutta Basu, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Niladri Bhattacharjee, Ms. Deblina Chattaraj, Ms. Angana Dutta, Advocates for alleged contemnor no.1.
Mr. Naba Kr. Das, Mr. Subhabrata Das, Advocates for alleged contemnor nos.2 & 3.
The Court : It is submitted on behalf of the alleged contemnors that the order dated 27th April, 2022 has been complied with. The revised appointment letter has been issued to the petitioner and he has also accepted the same and joined in terms of the revised appointment letter.
On behalf of the petitioner this submission is admitted. The learned Advocate for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that his client has joined as per the revised appointment letter.
Nothing further remains to be adjudicated in this contempt proceedings. The contempt proceedings is dropped.
2
The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of.
The Rule is also discharged.
(ARINDAM MUKHERJEE, J.)
pa
Upendra Kumar
Rajanvir Singh Kapur
Arindam Mukherjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
