A contempt original side application filed by Manik Chandra Ghosh against Pawan Kumar Mandal was dismissed for default due to the complete absence of advocates on behalf of the parties during the second call.
CC/32/2017 dismissed for default; interim order, if any, vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
OD 72
CC/32/2017 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (CONTEMPT) ORIGINAL SIDE
MANIK CHANDRA GHOSH @ MANIK GHOSH VS
PAWAN KUMAR MANDAL
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ Date : 2nd May, 2023.
The Court: None appears on behalf of the parties even in the second
call.
No accommodation is sought for by the applicant.
Accordingly, CC/32/2017 is dismissed for default.
Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
sp/
MANIK CHANDRA GHOSH
PAWAN KUMAR MANDAL
RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
